Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 8;15(9):e0238849. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238849

Table 3. Pairwise FST estimates between the Hungarian local chicken populations.

Breed HY 2002 HY 2017 HS 2002 HS 2017 HW 2002 HW 2017 TNNS 2002 TNNS 2017 TNNW 2002 TNNW 2017 TNNB 2002 TNNB 2017
HY2002
HY2017 0.03
HS2002 0.22 0.22
HS2017 0.24 0.24 0.04
HW2002 0.25 0.26 0.17 0.21
HW2017 0.29 0.30 0.22 0.27 0.06
TNNS2002 0.27 0.26 0.21 0.24 0.21 0.27
TNNS2017 0.22 0.21 0.20 0.22 0.19 0.24 0.08
TNNW2002 0.26 0.25 0.24 0.24 0.15 0.23 0.26 0.24
TNNW2017 0.26 0.24 0.25 0.25 0.19 0.27 0.30 0.26 0.05
TNNB2002 0.28 0.27 0.21 0.25 0.27 0.31 0.23 0.26 0.26 0.27
TNNB2017 0.26 0.25 0.20 0.25 0.22 0.26 0.19 0.21 0.23 0.24 0.08

Numbers marked with grey colour show the pairwise FST values between the populations of the same Hungarian breed sampled in 2002 and 2017.

HY = Yellow Hungarian, HS = Speckled Hungarian, HW = White Hungarian, TNNS = Speckled Transylvanian Naked Neck, TNNW = White Transylvanian Naked Neck, TNNB = Black Transylvanian Naked Neck.

Numbers in lower index of the populations indicate the year of sampling.