Table 9.
Model comparison results for the behavioural data for the 2.5 SD trimming alternative analysis
| Dependent variable | Model | WAIC | SE | dWAIC | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response time | Interaction (S R) | − 1623 | 66 | 0 | 1 |
| Main effects (S + R) | − 1521 | 64 | 102 | 0 | |
| Sequence (S) | − 1485 | 62 | 138 | 0 | |
| Response (R) | − 1448 | 56 | 175 | 0 | |
| Error | Interaction (S R) | − 5084 | 126 | 0 | 1 |
| Main effects (S + R) | − 5042 | 127 | 42 | 0 | |
| Response (R) | − 5032 | 126 | 52 | 0 | |
| Sequence (S) | − 5008 | 125 | 76 | 0 |
dWAIC shows the difference between each model’s WAIC and the best-fitting overall model’s WAIC, and Weight refers to Akaike’s weight for each model