Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 26;10:1404. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01404

Table 2.

Survival analysis of nivolumab treatment in patients with advanced/relapsed hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma.

Parameter Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR (95% CI) p HR (95% CI) p
PFS Gender (Male vs. Female) 0.50 (0.14–1.80) 0.286 0.35 (0.05–2.50) 0.294
Age (≥63 vs. <63) 0.19 (0.04–0.84) 0.029 0.12 (0.02–0.94) 0.044
HBV-DNA (≥215 vs. <215) 2.24 (0.84–5.93) 0.105 1.03 (0.34–3.07) 0.964
AFP (≥40 vs. <40) 1.09 (0.42–2.84) 0.863 3.72 (0.48–28.54) 0.207
Child-Pugh (A vs. B) 0.43 (0.16–1.13) 0.085 4.12 (0.76–22.40) 0.101
ECOG (≥2 vs. <2) 2.87 (0.95–8.67) 0.061 6.88 (0.94–50.22) 0.057
Hepatectomy (Yes vs. No) 2.85 (1.01–8.03) 0.048 13.10 (1.92–89.35) 0.009
TACE (Yes vs. No) 0.42 (0.16–1.13) 0.085 0.09 (0.02–0.46) 0.004
Number of nivolumab cycles (≥9 vs. <9) 0.28 (0.10–0.80) 0.017 0.09 (0.01–0.56) 0.010
Single dose of nivolumab (≥200 vs. <200) 1.97 (0.45–8.65) 0.371 0.57 (0.06–5.42) 0.624
Combined treatment (targeted therapy vs. chemo) 0.60 (0.21–1.74) 0.345 0.54 (0.11–2.61) 0.446
OS Gender (Male vs. Female) 0.68 (0.14–3.21) 0.625 1.99 (0.27–10.31) 0.424
Age (≥63 vs. <63) 0.17 (0.02–1.31) 0.089 0.16 (0.02–1.35) 0.092
HBV-DNA (≥215 vs. <215) 2.21 (0.76–6.42) 0.143 1.62 (0.52–5.01) 0.406
AFP (≥40 vs. <40) 1.60 (0.54–4.82) 0.398 2.33 (0.56–9.78) 0.248
Child-Pugh (A vs. B) 0.21 (0.06–0.74) 0.015 0.20 (0.05–0.81) 0.024
ECOG (≥2 vs. <2) 2.72 (0.77–9.69) 0.122 0.66 (0.13–3.32) 0.618
Hepatectomy (Yes vs. No) 1.87 (0.61–5.81) 0.276 2.17 (0.59–7.95) 0.241
TACE (Yes vs. No) 0.55 (0.19–1.61) 0.273 1.19 (0.30–4.75) 0.802
Number of nivolumab cycles (≥9 vs. <9) 0.26 (0.07–0.93) 0.039 0.44 (0.12–1.61) 0.214
Single dose of nivolumab (≥200 vs. <200) 4.21 (0.54–32.96) 0.171 0.80 (0.06–10.35) 0.863
Combined treatment (targeted therapy vs. chemo) 1.02 (0.31–3.32) 0.970 1.03 (0.23–4.70) 0.968