Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 3;20(5):50. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.9178

Table III.

Clinical characteristics of enrolled patients.

Parameter All patients (n=61) MUC1low (n=30) MUC1high (n=31) P-valuea
Age (years) 59 (39-77) 57 (39-72) 59 (40-77) 0.86
Gender       0.21
     Male 40 (65.57) 22 (73.33) 18 (58.06)  
     Female 21 (34.43) 8 (26.67) 13 (41.94)  
Number of tumors       0.85
     Single 42 (68.85) 24 (80.00) 18 (58.06)  
     Multiple 19 (31.15) 6 (20.00) 13 (41.94)  
Tumor size (cm) 6 (2-14) 6 (2-11.5) 6 (2.5-14) 0.79
Vascular invasion       0.28
     Yes 16 (26.23) 6 (20.00) 10 (32.26)  
     No 45 (73.77) 24 (80.00) 21 (67.74)  
Bile duct invasion       0.08
     Yes 6 (9.84) 5 (16.67) 1 (3.23)  
     No 55 (90.16) 25 (83.33) 30 (96.77)  
Nerve invasion       0.53
     Yes 3 (4.92) 2 (6.67) 1 (3.23)  
     No 58 (95.08) 28 (93.33) 30 (96.77)  
T stage       0.16
     T1a 14 (22.95) 9 (30.00) 5 (16.13)  
     T1b 17 (27.87) 8 (26.67) 9 (29.03)  
     T2 26 (42.62) 13 (43.33) 13 (41.94)  
     T3 0 (0.00) 0 (0.00) 0 (0.00)  
     T4 4 (6.56) 0 (0.00) 4 (12.90)  
LN metastasis       0.53
     Yes 3 (4.92) 2 (6.67) 1 (3.23)  
     No 58 (95.08) 28 (93.33) 30 (96.77)  
Surrounding tissue invasion       0.04
     Yes 4 (6.56) 0 (0.00) 4 (12.90)  
     No 57 (93.44) 30 (100.00) 27 (87.10)  
Differentiation       0.11
     Well 50 (81.97) 27 (90.00) 23 (74.19)  
     Poor 11 (18.03) 3 (10.00) 8 (25.81)  
Type of resection       0.29
     Less than hemihepatectomy 46 (75.41) 21 (70.00) 25 (80.65)  
     Hemihepatectomy 13 (21.31) 7 (23.33) 6 (19.35)  
Extended hemihepatectomy 2 (3.28) 2 (6.67) 0 (0.00)  
Post-operative treatment       0.311
     Yes 9 (14.75) 3 (10.00) 6 (19.35)  
     No 42 (68.85) 27 (90.00) 25 (80.65)  

Values are expressed as the median (range) or n (%). Vascular invasion, bile duct invasion and nerve invasion were identified pathologically. Post-operative treatment includes transarterial chemoembolization or radiofrequency ablation. LN, lymph node; MUC1, mucin 1.

aP-values represent comparison between MUC1low group and MUC1high group.