Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 14;11:925. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00925

TABLE 4.

Results of two multiple imputation QTL models (ANOVA).

QTL cM LOD % Variance F-value p-value (F)
X 1.23 203.34 61.96 1751.36 2.00E-16
2R-A 1.63 2.47 0.40 11.36 7.85E-04
2R-B 20.87 2.89 0.47 13.30 2.82E-04
2L 134.26 1.49 0.24 6.85 9.04E-03
3L-A 53.95 1.66 0.27 7.62 5.90E-03
3L-B 67.46 2.46 0.40 11.30 8.12E-04
Model y ∼ X + 2R-A + 2R-B + 2L + 3L-A + 3L-B
LOD 221.25
% Variance 71.66
X 1.23 207.86 62.68 907.89 2.00E-16
2R-A 1.63 2.73 0.43 12.52 4.25E-04
2R-B 20.87 3.02 0.48 13.87 2.10E-04
2L 134.26 6.02 0.96 13.96 1.10E-06
3L-A 53.95 1.62 0.26 7.40 6.66E-03
3L-B 67.46 2.15 0.34 9.87 1.74E-03
X × 2L epistatic 4.53 0.72 20.90 5.60E-06
Model y ∼ X + 2R-A + 2R-B + 2L + 3L-A + 3L-B + X:2L
LOD 225.78
% Variance 72.39

The top model includes only additive effects of each QTL. The bottom model includes all additive effects and also an epistatic effect between the X chromosome and the 2L QTL.