Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 7;7(9):1564–1573. doi: 10.1002/acn3.51132

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Comparison of age estimates. (A–C) Growth trajectories from infants with serial recordings (n = 47). (A) The visual interpretation of the EEG, (B) the visual interpretation of the aEEG and (C) the FBA versus PMA. Trajectories are colored according to the predicted age difference (lag, or bias between the true age and the FBA estimate). (D–E) Summary of the correlation of the visual interpretation of the EEG/aEEG and the FBA with PMA for individual raters (R1, R2, R3 and R4 for the EEG and R1, R2 and R3 for the aEEG) and the ensemble age estimate (Av). (D) Correlation with PMA, (E) Percentage of recordings within 1 week of PMA, (F) Percentage of recordings within 2 weeks of PMA. All values are shown as actual value (circular marker; EEG (blue), aEEG (green) and FBA (red) are colored) and 95% CI (whiskers).