Table 1. Odds ratio (Bayes factors) for assessing whether the transitions in simulations of differently sized boxes were governed by disparate processes.
Box size | Number of | Odds favouring | Jeffreys conclusion |
---|---|---|---|
simulations | two processes | ||
9 nm vs 12 nm | 1 vs 1 | 1.25 | barely worth mentioning |
9 nm vs 15 nm | 1 vs 1 | 0.93 | barely worth mentioning |
12 nm vs 15 nm | 1 vs 1 | 1.03 | barely worth mentioning |
9 nm vs 12 nm | 20 vs 10 | 0.43 | barely worth mentioning |
9 nm vs 15 nm | 20 vs 20 | 0.38 | barely worth mentioning |
12 nm vs 15 nm | 10 vs 20 | 0.33 | substantial evidence for one process |
9 nm vs 12 nm | 100 vs 10 | 0.33 | substantial evidence for one process |
9 nm vs 15 nm | 100 vs 20 | 0.26 | substantial evidence for one process |