Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 27;11:877. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00877

Table 2.

Total effect, direct effect, and mediation effects of PA/NA on sleep quality via trait-FoMO/state-FoMO and smartphone addiction.

Path (PA➔trait-FoMO) B SE 95%CI Path (PA➔state-FoMO) B SE 95%CI
Total effect -0.079 0.028 -0.134, -0.024 Total effect -0.079 0.028 -0.134, -0.024
Direct effect -0.062 0.026 -0.114, -0.010 Direct effect -0.070 0.027 -0.122, -0.018
Total mediation effect -0.018 0.012 -0.043, 0.006 Total mediation effect -0.009 0.012 -0.033, 0.014
Ind1 -0.003 0.004 -0.012, 0.006 Ind1 0.006 0.004 0.000, 0.015
Ind2 -0.014 0.009 -0.032, 0.003 Ind2 -0.024 0.009 -0.042, -0.008
Ind3 -0.002 0.003 -0.007, 0.004 Ind3 0.008 0.004 0.000, 0.017
Path (NA➔trait-FoMO) B SE 95%CI Path (NA➔state-FoMO) B SE 95%CI
Total effect 0.414 0.027 0.362, 0.466 Total effect 0.414 0.027 0.362, 0.466
Direct effect 0.336 0.028 0.282, 0.391 Direct effect 0.348 0.027 0.295, 0.402
Total mediation effect 0.078 0.012 0.055, 0.103 Total mediation effect 0.066 0.011 0.046, 0.089
Ind1 0.021 0.008 0.006, 0.037 Ind1 0.012 0.005 0.002, 0.024
Ind2 0.045 0.009 0.028, 0.063 Ind2 0.044 0.009 0.027, 0.062
Ind3 0.013 0.003 0.007, 0.019 Ind3 0.011 0.003 0.006, 0.017
C1 -0.024 0.013 -0.050, 0.002 C1 -0.032 0.012 -0.056, -0.009
C2 0.008 0.009 -0.009, 0.026 C2 0.001 0.006 -0.011, 0.014
C3 0.032 0.008 0.017, 0.049 C3 0.033 0.008 0.018, 0.049
Effect ratio (%) 19.1 Effect ratio (%) 16.2

Confidence intervals for effects are bias corrected based on 5,000 bootstrap samples. a1. PA/NA to Trait-FoMO/State-FoMO, a2. PA/NA to smartphone addiction, b1. Trait-FoMO/State-FoMO to sleep quality, b2. Smartphone addiction to sleep quality, d1. Trait-FoMO/State-FoMO to smartphone addiction. Ind1 = PA/NA➔Trait-FoMO/State-FoMO➔Sleep quality, Ind2 = PA/NA➔Smartphone addiction➔Sleep quality, Ind3 = PA/NA➔Trait-FoMO/State-FoMO➔Smartphone addiction➔Sleep quality. CI = Ind1 minus Ind2, C2 = Ind1 minus Ind3, C3 = Ind2 minus Ind3. Effect ratio = Total mediation effect/Total effect. Bold values are highlighted to show where the 95% confidence interval (CI) contains zero, then the effect will not be significant at the 0.05 level..