Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 2;7:100251. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2020.100251

Table 3.

Comparison of qualitative analyses between CBCT and XR.

P (Wilcoxon test) Correlation (Spearmann r)
Schenberg zone 0.5722 0.5698
Bridges 0.6072 0.3397
Overall impression 0.7744 0.4783
Density 0.125 0.2141
Translation 0.0002 0.2906
Humpback deformity 0.2101 −0.05495
Communition 0.7539 0.1797
Cyst formation 0.3438 −0.09759

CBCT: cone-beam computed tomography; XR: X-ray.