Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 21;10(23):10548–10562. doi: 10.7150/thno.46826

Table 3.

Comparative sensitivity of nitroreductase-expressing HCT116 cells to HCT116 WT cells for various nitro(hetero)aromatic compounds

graphic file with name thnov10p10548i008.jpg
graphic file with name thnov10p10548i009.jpg R =
graphic file with name thnov10p10548i010.jpg graphic file with name thnov10p10548i011.jpg graphic file with name thnov10p10548i012.jpg graphic file with name thnov10p10548i013.jpg graphic file with name thnov10p10548i014.jpg graphic file with name thnov10p10548i015.jpg
Cell Line PR-104A EF5 EF3 Pimo F-miso RSU1069 HX4
NfsA_Ec 985 1600 1050 71 690 108 52
NfsB_Ec 1643 57 60 2 203 13 103
YcaK_Ec 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
YieF_Ec 2 1 2 1 1 2 1
AzoR_Ec 3 1 1 1 1 2 3
MdaB_Ec 33 1 1 1 1 2 1
WrbA_Ec 4 2 1 1 1 2 1
KefF_Ec 3 1 1 1 1 1 1
YcdI_Ec 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
YdjA_Ec 1 2 2 1 1 1 1
NemA_Ec 14 4 8 2 28 5 4

Cell lines were exposed to compounds for 18 hours at a range of concentrations followed by 5 days growth in drug-free media. IC50 values were determined as the concentration required to inhibit cell growth by 50% of untreated controls. Values in the table represent the fold change in IC50 of the stated cell line relative to HCT116 WT cells. Raw IC50 values are provided in Supplementary table 1.