Table 2.
Logistic regression | Elastic net | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean AUC (95% CI) | Model fit | Mean AUC (95% CI) | Model fit | λ | α | |
Year 1 | ||||||
Eating disorder diagnosis | 0.48 (0.41–0.56) | Extremely poor | 0.62 (0.53–0.71) | Poor | 0.070 | 0.2 |
Binge eating | 0.69 (0.65–0.73) | Poor | 0.77 (0.73–0.81) | Fair | 0.082 | 0.8 |
Compensatory behaviors | 0.83 (0.80–0.86) | Good | 0.88 (0.87–0.90) | Good | 0.309 | 0.1 |
Underweight BMI | 0.80 (0.74–0.85) | Good | 0.93 (0.91–0.95) | Excellent | 0.025 | 1 |
Year 2 | ||||||
Eating disorder diagnosis | 0.47 (0.40–0.55) | Extremely poor | 0.61 (0.56–0.67) | Poor | 0.110 | 0.3 |
Binge eating | 0.64 (0.61–0.68) | Poor | 0.71 (0.68–0.74) | Fair | 0.150 | 0.3 |
Compensatory behaviors | 0.72 (0.66–0.77) | Fair | 0.85 (0.81–0.89) | Good | 0.100 | 0.5 |
Underweight BMI | 0.70 (0.65–0.77) | Fair | 0.89 (0.86–0.91) | Good | 0.178 | 0.3 |
AUC, Area Under the Receiving Operating Characteristics Curve; BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval.
The λ (penalization) and α (mixing) parameters were identified through 10-fold cross-validation repeated three times for the elastic net models.