Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Contraception. 2020 May 12;102(3):180–185. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.05.002

Table 3:

Associations between genetic variants and objective weight change in a study of etonogestrel implant users

Objective weight change
β 95% CI
Genetic Variants
CYP3A5 rs15524* 0.75 −0.71, 2.21
CYP3A4*1G§ 0.38 −1.39, 2.16
CYP3A4 rs2246709§ −0.93 −2.09, 0.24
CYP3A4 rs4646440§ 1.53 −0.05, 3.09
ESR1 rs9322335* 1.64 0.27, 3.01
CYP2C19 rs11568732§ −2.82 −5.62, −0.02
AKR1C3 rs12529* 1.17 0.03, 2.31
ESR1 rs2077647* 1.29 0.05, 2.53
ESR1 rs2228480* 2.68 1.13, 4.24
CYP2C19 rs7088784§ −2.99 −5.46, −0.52
ESR1 rs9340799* 1.95 0.34, 3.55

Performed using simple linear regression

Statistically significant using p-value cut-off <0.05

*

Genetic variant grouped as participants with two copies of variant allele (homozygous variant) versus all others

§

Genetic variant grouped as participants with at least one copy of the variant allele (carriers) versus all others