Table 3:
Associations between genetic variants and objective weight change in a study of etonogestrel implant users
| Objective weight change | ||
|---|---|---|
| β | 95% CI | |
| Genetic Variants | ||
| CYP3A5 rs15524* | 0.75 | −0.71, 2.21 |
| CYP3A4*1G§ | 0.38 | −1.39, 2.16 |
| CYP3A4 rs2246709§ | −0.93 | −2.09, 0.24 |
| CYP3A4 rs4646440§ | 1.53 | −0.05, 3.09 |
| ESR1 rs9322335* | 1.64† | 0.27, 3.01 |
| CYP2C19 rs11568732§ | −2.82† | −5.62, −0.02 |
| AKR1C3 rs12529* | 1.17† | 0.03, 2.31 |
| ESR1 rs2077647* | 1.29† | 0.05, 2.53 |
| ESR1 rs2228480* | 2.68† | 1.13, 4.24 |
| CYP2C19 rs7088784§ | −2.99† | −5.46, −0.52 |
| ESR1 rs9340799* | 1.95† | 0.34, 3.55 |
Performed using simple linear regression
Statistically significant using p-value cut-off <0.05
Genetic variant grouped as participants with two copies of variant allele (homozygous variant) versus all others
Genetic variant grouped as participants with at least one copy of the variant allele (carriers) versus all others