Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Apr 2;27(9):853–865. doi: 10.1111/acem.13955

Table 3.

Utilization and clinical outcomes of participants randomized to SynDA tool vs. Control.

Outcome Variable SynDA Group n=24 Control Group n=26 Difference between groups (95%CI)
Utilization Outcomes
Index Visit
Admitted to hospital 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0%
Sent to observation unit 4 (17%) 7 (27%) 10.3% (−13, 32)
Discharged from ED 20 (83%) 19 (73%) −10.3% (−32, 13)
CT scan 1 (4.2%) 1 (3.8%) −0.3% (−1.6, 1.5)
30-day follow-up period n=20 n=24
Repeat ED visit 1 (5.0%) 2 (8.3%) 3.3% (−16, 21)
Office visit 14 (70%) 17 (71%) 0.8% (−24, 27)
Hospital admission 1 (5.0%) 1 (4.2%) −0.8% (−20, 16)
Clinical Outcomes at 30 days
New significant diagnosis 2 (10%) 2 (8.4%) −1.7% (−23, 17)
-Acute stroke 1 (5.0%) 0 (0%) −5% (−24, 9.4)
-Heart failure 1 (5.0%) 0 (0%) −5% (−24, 9.4)
-Cardiac arrhythmia 0 (0%) 1 (4.2%) 4.2% (−12, 20)
-Large pericardial effusion 0 (0%) 1 (4.2%) 4.2% (−12, 20)
Mortality 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0%
Patient Involvement (Index Visit) n=22 n=22
OPTION-5 Score, mean (SD) Range: 0-100 (Audio recording) 52.0 (SD=18) 26.6 (SD=21) −25.4 (−13.5, −37.3)
Duration of discussion, median (IQR) minutes:seconds 5:26 3:29 Wilcoxon two-sample test, p=0.003

ED: Emergency Department; CT: Computed tomography; OPTION-5: Observing Patient Involvement in Decision-Making; SD: Standard Deviation; IQR: Interquartile Range.