Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Res Methods. 2020 Oct;52(5):1951–1969. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01365-9

Table 1.

Sample benefits and risks of longform audio recordings by population

Benefit Risk
Individual Participants
  • More life experiences represented in scientific research

  • Quantitative reports (e.g. daily language counts) could be made available to participants and clinicians

  • Loss of privacy and confidentiality as participants record their personal information, such as names and financial information

  • Possible legal consequences if illicit activity such as drug use or domestic abuse is recorded, discovered, and reported

Society and Communities at Large
  • Studies of interventions carried out using the technology may lead to advances in public policy/health recommendations

  • Comprehensive datasets document cultural and linguistic traditions

  • Development of normative standards based on more representative samples

  • Generalizations of potentially unflattering findings

  • Potential to reveal aspects of family/ community life that conflict with how communities would want to be portrayed

  • Propagation of bias if algorithms are developed based on non-representative samples

Researcher/Research team
  • Efficient collection of large quantities of data

  • Ability to reuse data for additional research projects

  • Snapshots of private moments or illegal activity may lead to discomfort or researcher ethical conflict of interest

  • Potential for equipment damage as recordings are made outside of the lab

Scientific Community
  • Larger, more comprehensive datasets, leading to greater ecological validity and generalizability of findings

  • Documentation of naturalistic behaviors from more diverse communities, leading to robust theories

  • Processing algorithms that permit comparison across datasets and laboratories

  • Greater opportunities for data re-use among researchers with varied interests from different fields

  • Processing algorithms that permit comparison across datasets and laboratories may not capture relevant behaviors within individual communities

  • Over-reliance on audio could lead to theories that emphasize auditory and verbal information over other modalities

  • Exploring the vast number of measures that can be derived could lead to spurious findings