Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Aging Ment Health. 2020 Mar 5;25(6):1029–1034. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2020.1732294

Table 2.

Incidence rate ratios (IRR) for the association between perceived social isolation and social disconnectedness and the rate of falls.

Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
IRR (95% CI) IRR (95% CI) IRR (95% CI) IRR (95% CI)
Perceived isolation
 No perceived isolation Ref Ref Ref Ref
 Either no perceived support or felt lonely 1.21 (1.11–1.31) 1.20 (1.11–1.30) 1.08 (1.00–1.17)
 Both no perceived support and felt lonely 1.36 (1.14–1.63) 1.33 (1.11–1.58) 1.04 (0.87–1.25)
Social disconnectedness index 1.05 (1.01–1.09) 1.03 (0.99–1.07) 1.02 (0.98–1.06)
CESD scale 1.13 (1.11–1.16)

Source: 2006–2012 Health and Retirement Study. Model 1: perceived isolation and the covariates. Model 2: social disconnectedness and the covariates. Model 3: both types of social isolation and the covariates. Model 4: both types of social isolation, depression and the covariates.

IRR, incidence rate ratio; CI, confident interval; depression scale, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD) without feeling loneliness variable (range = 0–7); covariates, age, gender, race, education, alcohol consumption, and co-morbidities.