Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Gastroenterology. 2020 May 4;159(2):562–574. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.04.057

Table 2:

Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis for lymph node metastasis in training and validation cohorts

Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
Characteristics OR 95% CI P-value OR 95% CI P-value
Training cohort (n = 157)
Age (≥70 vs. <70 years) 0.55 0.29–1.04 0.07 0.53 0.23–1.23 0.14
Gender (Female vs. Male) 0.67 0.35–1.26 0.21 0.45 0.19–1.06 0.07
CA19–9 (≥ 71.5 vs. < 71.5 U/mL) 2.44 1.28–4.66 < 0.01 2.18 0.92–5.14 0.08
Location (Pbt vs. Ph) 0.32 0.16–0.63 < 0.01 0.21 0.09–0.53 < 0.01
Tumor size (≥ 28 vs. < 28 mm) 1.75 0.91–3.38 0.01 1.85 0.78–4.41 0.17
6-miRNA signature (High vs. Low risk) 33.36 9.57–116.23 < 0.01 19.93 7.55–52.62 < 0.01
Validation cohort (n = 107)
Age (≥70 vs. <70 years) 0.59 0.27–1.29 0.19 1.00 0.39–2.60 0.99
Gender (Female vs. Male) 0.94 0.44–2.04 0.88 1.11 0.43–2.83 0.83
CA19–9 (≥ 71.5 vs. < 71.5 U/mL) 2.75 1.20–6.30 0.02 1.55 0.58–4.13 0.38
Location (Pbt vs. Ph) 0.49 0.22–1.10 0.08 0.50 0.19–1.29 0.15
Tumor size (≥ 28 vs. < 28 mm) 2.14 0.98–4.68 0.06 1.75 0.66–4.65 0.26
6-miRNA signature (High vs. Low risk) 11.09 4.09–30.04 < 0.01 10.05 3.42–29.59 < 0.01

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval