Table 3.
Correlates of first use occurring at a nightclub.
Bivariable tests | Multivariable model | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non-nightclub venue weighted % | Nightclub weighted % | P | aPR | (95% CI) | P | |
Age – Mean (SE) | 25.2 (0.5) | 27.8 (0.8) | .007 | 1.04 | (0.99, 1.09) | .102 |
Sex | .230 | |||||
Male | 62.3 | 72.2 | 1.00 | |||
Female | 37.7 | 27.8 | 1.04 | (0.54, 1.99) | .906 | |
Race/Ethnicity | .391 | |||||
White | 48.0 | 47.9 | 1.00 | |||
Black | 3.0 | 7.5 | 2.39 | (1.05, 5.48) | .039 | |
Hispanic | 21.2 | 28.3 | 1.21 | (0.65, 2.27) | .543 | |
Asian | 20.4 | 12.7 | 0.95 | (0.40, 2.23) | .903 | |
Other/Mixed | 7.4 | 3.6 | 0.72 | (0.24, 2.09) | .540 | |
Sexual Orientation | <.001 | |||||
Heterosexual | 87.0 | 61.3 | 1.00 | |||
Gay/Lesbian | 6.4 | 31.3 | 2.81 | (1.54, 5.12) | .001 | |
Bisexual | 5.9 | 5.8 | 1.38 | (0.49, 3.86) | .540 | |
Other Sexuality | 0.7 | 1.6 | 2.56 | (1.02, 6.45) | .046 |
Note. Rao-Scott chi-square was used to determine whether there were bivariable differences, although differences in age, which is a ratio measurement, were determined using linear regression. All variables were then fit as covariates into separate multivariable generalized linear models using Poisson and log link to determine associations with all else being equal. This generated adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A Bonferroni statistical correction was applied to bivariable tests, so results are only deemed statistically significant when p < .0125 (alpha = .05/4 outcomes).