Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurobiol Aging. 2020 Jun 29;94:287–297. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2020.06.016

Table 1.

Behavioral results collected during session one (valence rating), and during session two (vividness rating, plausibility rating, accuracy of identifying repetition status).

Age group Younger adults
Older adults
Simulation valence Negative Positive Neutral Negative Positive Neutral
Rating Repetition
Valence 1.43 (0.23) 4.53 (0.25) 3.06 (0.09) 1.79 (0.55) 4.42 (0.37) 3.12 (0.19)
Vividness Two 3.71 (0.50) 3.73 (0.48) 3.48 (0.54) 4.12 (0.83) 4.20 (0.75) 3.99 (0.90)
Five 4.13 (0.52) 4.06 (0.50) 3.90 (0.48) 4.34 (0.70) 4.51 (0.61) 4.27 (0.78)
Plausibility Two 3.30 (0.64) 3.87 (0.51) 3.91 (0.57) 3.77 (0.94) 4.03 (0.72) 4.04 (0.85)
Five 3.50 (0.72) 3.92 (0.54) 4.14 (0.46) 3.84 (0.93) 4.29 (0.62) 4.23 (0.62)
Accuracy Two 0.98 (0.03) 0.98 (0.04) 0.96 (0.08) 0.91 (0.17) 0.90 (0.19) 0.89 (0.19)
Five 0.95 (0.10) 0.95 (0.08) 0.92 (0.13) 0.89 (0.19) 0.90 (0.14) 0.90 (0.14)