Table 3:
Cu(I) EXAFS Fitting Parameters of Constructs Reported Compared to Native Cupredoxins
| Construct | Model | Cu-Imid R (Å) | Cu-Imid σ2 (Å2) × 10−3 | Cu-S R (Å) | Cu-S σ2 (Å2) 1× 10−3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRα3DChC231 | Cu(Imid)2S1 | 1.92 | 14.1 | 2.17 | 5.8 |
| GR α3DChC3 | Cu(Imid)2S1 | 1.95 | 18.3 | 2.20 | 7.7 |
| GR α3DChC4 | Cu(Imid)2S1 | 1.99 | 10.7 | 2.20 | 7.0 |
| GR α3DChC5 | Cu(Imid)2S1 | 1.97 | 13.6 | 2.20 | 6.0 |
| Nitrosocyanin14 | Cu(N/O)2S1 | 1.96 | 4.0 | 2.30 | 3.2 |
| Af Cu nitrite reductase40* | Cu(Imid)2S1…S1 | 1.91 | - | 2.21 | - |
| 2.06 | - | 2.41 | - | ||
| Poplar Plastocyanin41–42 | Cu(Imid)2S1…S1 | 1.96 | - | 2.19 | - |
| 2.01 | - | 2.86 | - |
Distances from EXAFS analysis were not available so those determined crystallographically are shown in the table.