Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 27;18:2270–2280. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2020.08.011

Table 3.

Variant calling results on Sample 1. Four variant callers were tested: SiNVICT, OutLyzer, DeepSNVMiner and UMI-VarCal and for each tool, True Positives (TP), False Positives (FP), False Negatives (FN), sensitivity and specificity are reported.

Variant Caller TP FP FN Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%)
SiNVICT 8 233 5 61.5 99.7
OutLyzer 11 98 2 84.6 99.9
DeepSNVMiner 12 37 1 92.3 99.95
UMI-VarCal 13 0 0 100 100