Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 27;18:2270–2280. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2020.08.011

Table 4.

Variant calling results on Sample 2. Four variant callers were tested: SiNVICT, OutLyzer, DeepSNVMiner and UMI-VarCal and for each tool, True Positives (TP), False Positives (FP), False Negatives (FN), sensitivity and specificity are reported.

Variant Caller TP FP FN Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%)
SiNVICT 8 455 7 53.4 99.4
OutLyzer 12 330 3 80 99.6
DeepSNVMiner 14 2 1 93.4 99.99
UMI-VarCal 15 0 0 100 100