Table 2.

Comparison of the constructs’ effects for the full sample (n = 337) and before (n = 159) and after (n = 178) implementation of measures.

		Past = 0 (159) Past = 1 (178)
		Constructs' effects	Path Coeffs (Full)	p-values n = 337	Path Coeffs (past = 0)	p-values n = 159	Path Coeffs (past = 1)	p-values n = 178	Path Coeffs Delta (past 0 vs.1)	p-values of Delta
Opportunity appraisal	Direct effects	H1a: Opportunity -> Benef Maximizing	0.54	0.000	0.68	0.000	0.39	0.000	0.29	0.001
		H1b: Opportunity -> Benef Satisficing	0.24	0.000	0.46	0.000	0.08	0.527	0.38	0.008
		H3a: Perceived Control -> Benef Maximizing	0.28	0.000	0.20	0.001	0.41	0.000	−0.22	0.024
		H3b: Perceived Control -> Benef Satisficing	0.18	0.010	0.21	0.015	0.07	0.579	0.15	0.165
	Moderating effects	H4a: Perceived Control/ Opport -> Benef Maximizing	−0.08	0.026	−0.06	0.402	−0.07	0.118	0.01	0.455
		H4b: Perceived Control/ Opport -> Benef Satisficing	−0.07	0.277	−0.03	0.796	0.03	0.687	−0.05	0.672
Threat appraisal	Direct effects	H2a: Threat -> Disturbance Handling	0.45	0.000	0.43	0.000	0.40	0.000	0.03	0.384
		H2b: Threat -> Self-preservation	−0.23	0.000	−0.17	0.068	−0.26	0.001	0.09	0.237
		H5a: Perceived Control -> Disturbance Handling	0.40	0.000	0.39	0.000	0.52	0.000	−0.14	0.194
		H5b: Perceived Control -> Self-preservation	0.23	0.000	0.28	0.001	0.20	0.043	0.08	0.286
	Moderating effects	H6a: Perceived Control/ Threat -> Disturb Handling	−0.12	0.050	−0.13	0.070	−0.09	0.237	−0.04	0.652
		H6b: Perceived Control/ Threat -> Self-preservation	0.15	0.007	0.11	0.223	0.25	0.000	−0.14	0.200

*** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05.