Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 10;11:4529. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18255-5

Table 2.

Linear mixed model regression analysis for HD motor progression.

Parameter Outcome: motor score Outcome: random slope
Coef. SE T statistic P value Coef. SE T statistic P value
Female 3.375 0.474 7.127 1.16 × 10−12 0.016 0.051 0.316 0.8
Age 2.217 0.045 48.878 <5.0 × 10−300 0.013 0.005 2.749 5.99 × 10−3
CAG length 2.743 0.089 30.757 5.27 × 10−191 0.071 0.010 7.449 1.09 × 10−13
Age at motor onset −1.542 0.049 −31.687 1.24 × 10−201 −0.010 0.005 −2.006 4.49 × 10−2
Education −1.877 0.193 −9.742 3.09 × 10−22 −0.083 0.021 −4.037 5.49 × 10−5
Visit 3.516 0.078 45.019 <5.0 × 10−300

The table presents the coefficient estimates from two linear regression models: (1) a linear mixed model analysis of 14,850 longitudinal motor scores (dependent variable) across 5204 manifest HD cases from Enroll-HD data 1 and (2) a linear regression model analysis of the resulting random slope estimates (dependent variable) of the same 5204 cases. The linear mixed-effects model included two random-effects (a random intercept term and a random slope term with respect to visit) and several fixed-effect terms (sex, age at baseline, CAG-repeat length, age at motor onset, educational attainment). The empirical Bayes estimate of the random slope was used as a measure of HD motor progression for each of the N = 5204 manifest HD cases. We adjusted the random slope estimate for all fixed effects in our downstream EWAS analysis. The columns report the covariate name, regression coefficient, standard error, Student’s T statistic, and unadjusted two-sided Wald test p value.