Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 19;21(8):149–159. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12937

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

(a) The “ground‐truth” Acuros XB (AXB) dose maps and relative differences between (b) the original anisotropic‐analytic‐algorithm (AAA) and the AXB dose maps; (c) the boosted AAA and the AXB dose maps, for a three‐dimensional non‐coplanar static beam plan. (d) The “ground‐truth” AXB dose maps and relative differences between (e) the original AAA and the AXB dose maps; (f) the boosted AAA and the AXB dose maps, for a volumetric‐modulated arc plan. The “ground‐truth” AXB doses were shown in absolute quantities (Gy). The dose differences were normalized to the plan prescription dose (%).