Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 9;5(9):e002213. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002213

Table 4.

Cost per averted disability-adjusted life year (2017 US$D, unless indicated otherwise)

Country income group Country Author Study type Sample size Study design Provider Intervention details Cost elements Intervention subgroup Cost (2017 US$) 2017 country GDP per capita
Blend Blend Basu Pharm only - modelled Not applicable Hypothetical population-level model Not specified A ‘treat-to-target’ (TTT) strategy in which BP therapy is titrated until blood pressures fall below a threshold, a ‘benefit-based, tailored’ (BBT) strategy in which BP therapy is initiated for patients with high estimated CVD risk, and a hybrid strategy that combines TTT and BBT. Drugs, costs of medical services - including patient-borne costs BBT - China 220.90 8826
BBT - India 290.61 1939
Hybrid - India 371.58 1939
TTT - India 412.85 1939
Hybrid - China 449.25 8826
TTT - China 450.80 8826
Lower middle Ghana Gad Pharm only – modelled Not applicable Hypothetical population-level model Not specified A core treatment model was used to estimate the long-term costs and health effects of the five main classes of antihypertensive drugs and a ‘no intervention” comparator: ACE inhibitors (ACEI), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), beta blockers (BB), calcium channel blockers (CCB), thiazide-like diuretics Drugs, cost medical visits not further disaggregated Diuretics 61.24 2025
CCB 799.35 2025
ACEI 1555.47 2025
ARB 1808.72 2025
BB 1462.90 2025
Lower middle Vietnam Ha Pharm plus - modelled Not applicable Hypothetical population-level model Doctors, nurses Comparison of a set of personal and non-personal prevention strategies to reduce CVD in Vietnam, including mass media campaigns for reducing consumption of salt and tobacco, drugs for lowering blood pressure or cholesterol, and combined pharmacotherapy for people at varying levels of absolute risk of a cardiovascular event. Drugs, laboratories, labour, travel/transportation/per diem and media costs. Education and individual treatment (beta-blocker and diuretic) for treatment of SBP >160. 94.24 2343
Education and individual treatment (beta-blocker and diuretic) for treatment of SBP >140. 268.83 2343
Upper middle Thailand Khonputsa Pharm only – modelled Not applicable Hypothetical population-level model Doctors Analysis of monotherapy and combination therapy of thiazide diuretics (D), CCB, BB, ACEI and ARB. Cost-effectiveness analysis includes cost-offsets, that is, the cost of disease treatments that are avoided by prevention. The study calculated cost-effectiveness figures using the lowest cost generic and the median cost medication shown in the Ministry of Health website. The figures reported in this table are based on the median cost. 10-year CVD risk 5% to 9.9%, D+CCB+ACEI 2077.34 6578
10-year CVD risk 5% to 9.9%, D 692.45 6578
10-year CVD risk 5% to 9.9%, CCB 1483.41 6578
10-year CVD risk 5% to 9.9%, ACEI 2934.65 6578
10-year CVD risk 5% to 9.9%, BB 6594.72 6578
10-year CVD risk 5% to 9.9%, ARB 10 221.82 6578
10-year CVD risk 10% to 19.9%, D 286.87 6578
10-year CVD risk 10% to 19.9%, CCB 890.29 6578
10-year CVD risk 10% to 19.9%, ACEI 1912.47 6578
10-year CVD risk 10% to 19.9%, BB 5935.25 6578
10-year CVD risk 10% to 19.9%, ARB 7583.93 6578
10-year CVD risk 20% and up, CCB 309.95 6578
10-year CVD risk 20% and up, ACEI 956.24 6578
10-year CVD risk 20% and up, BB 3627.10 6578
10-year CVD risk 20% and up, ARB 4616.31 6578
Low Nepal Krishnan Pharm plus – modelled Not applicable Hypothetical population-level model Community health workers provide blood pressure screening, lifestyle counselling, referrals and follow-up on adherence to antihypertensive medication via home visits Drugs, labour, travel, training costs, administrative costs Adults aged 25 to 65 with hypertension 568.16 911
All adults aged 25 to 65 401.23 911
Upper middle Sri Lanka Lung Pharm only – modelled Not applicable Hypothetical population-level model Doctors The intervention group received the triple pill consisting of amlodipine, telmisartan and chlorthalidone (with discontinuation of current monotherapy, if applicable) as part of their usual hypertension clinic visits. There were scheduled clinic visits at 6, 12 and 24 weeks (end of study), which included blood pressure measurement, potential changes in medications in line with local guidelines at the discretion of the treating physician, and assessment of adverse events. Drugs, cost of outpatient and inpatient visits not further disaggregated Usual care 1323.46 4105
Intervention group 1693.92 4105
Blend Blend Murray* Pharm plus - modelled Not applicable Hypothetical population-level model Not specified Seventeen non-personal and personal health-service interventions or combinations, including salt reduction through voluntary agreements with industry and salt intake legislation, health education campaigns and treatment and education for hypertension. Hypertension treatment for people with BP above two thresholds (140 and 160) was a standard regimen of beta blockers and diuretics. Treatment for people with absolute risk of cardiovascular event over next 10 years based on four thresholds (35%, 25%, 15% and 5%) with a statin, diuretic, beta blocker and aspirin. Drugs, laboratories, labour, cost of medical visit or screening - not further disaggregated, travel/transportation/per diem, building overhead costs, training costs and media costs. Eligibility: SBP above 160 (SE Asia) 51.24*
PPP dollars
n/a
Eligibility: SBP above 160 (Latin America) 115.30*
PPP dollars
n/a
Eligibility: SBP above 140 (SE Asia) 128.11*
PPP dollars
n/a
Eligibility: SBP above 140 (Latin America) 264.76*
PPP dollars
n/a
Eligibility: SBP above 160 (Europe) 288.96*
PPP dollars
n/a
Eligibility: SBP above 140 (Europe) 646.25*
PPP dollars
n/a
Treatment of risk above 35% (Latin America) 37.26*
PPP dollars
n/a
Treatment of risk above 25% (Latin America) 52.67*
PPP dollars
n/a
Treatment of risk above 15% (Latin America) 76.87*
PPP dollars
n/a
Treatment of risk above 5% (Latin America) 132.38*
PPP dollars
n/a
Treatment of risk above 25% (Europe) 239.14*
PPP dollars
n/a
Treatment of risk above 15% (Europe) 306.04*
PPP dollars
n/a
Treatment of risk above 5% (Europe) 446.97*
PPP dollars
n/a
Treatment of risk above 25% (SE Asia) 46.97*
PPP dollars
n/a
Treatment of risk above 15% (SE Asia) 68.33*
PPP dollars
n/a
Treatment of risk above 5% (SE Asia) 109.61*
PPP dollars
n/a
Low Tanzania Ngalesoni Pharm only - modelled Not applicable Hypothetical population-level model Not specified Pharmaceutical treatment with ACE inhibitors and diuretics modelled for four different risk levels. Very high risk is categorised as having SBP of 160 to 179 and being a smoker; high risk is having SBP of 160 to 179 and not being a smoker; moderate risk is having SBP of 140 to 159; and low risk is having SBP of 120 to 139. Drugs, costs of medical visit or screening - not further disaggregated Moderate risk 2616.98 936
High risk 1761.58 936
Very high risk 1533.00 936
Low risk 1419.41 936
Blend Sub-Saharan Africa region and South East Asia region Ortegon Pharm plus – modelled Not applicable Hypothetical population-level model Not specified Cost-effectiveness analysis of 123 single or combined prevention and treatment strategies for cardiovascular disease, diabetes and smoking. Relevant interventions were treatment with beta blockers and diuretics and along with patient education for two eligibility criteria (those with SBP above 140 and those above 160). Drugs, laboratories, cost of medical visit or screening not further disaggregated, intervention development cost, training cost, media cost, monitoring and evaluation cost, other unspecified costs Sub-Saharan Africa, eligibility: SBP >160 180.95*
PPP dollars
n/a
Sub-Saharan Africa, eligibility: SBP >140 504.36* PPP dollars n/a
South East Asia, eligibility: SBP >160 182.24* PPP dollars n/a
South East Asia, eligibility: SBP <140 621.14* PPP dollars n/a
Lower middle India Praveen Pharm only 62 194 Cross-sectional study Not specified Comparing the BP lowering effect of treatment eligibility standards compared with an untreated population. The different treatment standards were: (1) current practice (not further defined); (2) treating people with HTN using the 140/90 mm Hg threshold; (3) treatment according to the new Indian NPCDCS guidelines (drug therapy recommended in patients with CVD risk 20% to 30% and BP levels ≥140/90 mm Hg or CVD risk of ≥30% and BP level’s ≥130/80 mm Hg; (4) treating everyone in the intermediate and high risk categories (regardless of BP level); and (5) treating only those in the high risk category (regardless of BP level). Drugs, costs of medical visit or screening - not further disaggregated Treatment of all at high risk 213.72 1939
Treatment of all at intermediate and high risk 241.03 1939
Treatment according to NPCDCS guidelines 365.43 1939
Current practice (undefined) 380.27 1939
Treatment of patients with BP greater than 140/90 mm Hg 459.66 1939
Treatment of all above 55 years of age 472.51 1939
Treatment of all above 45 years of age 601.69 1939
Low Tanzania Robberstad Pharm only - modelled Not applicable Hypothetical population-level model Not specified Fourteen pharmaceutical interventions of primary prevention of cardiovascular disease, four of which specifically target hypertension exclusively. Drugs, cost of medical visit or screening - not further disaggregated, travel/transportation/per diem, building overhead costs (utilities, maintenance, and so on), equipment costs and office supplies Diuretics 106.68 936
Beta blockers 412.93 936
Calcium channel blockers 1374.33 936
Diuretics and beta blockers 155.63 936
Lower middle Nigeria Rosendaal Pharm plus - modelled Not applicable Hypothetical population-level model Not specified Population-level hypertension screening and subsequent antihypertensive treatment for high CVD risk individuals in the context of the KSHI programme. Two eligibility strategies: first was CVD risk and BP level, in which all individuals with HTN stage 1 combined with a 10-year CVD risk greater than 20% as well as all individuals with stage 2 HTN regardless of risk were treated. The second was CVD based only, in which all individuals with 10-year CVD risk greater than 20% were eligible. Three estimates of relative risk reduction, based on (1) Lawes, (2) Rapsomaniki and (3) Framingham. Labs, labour, cost of medical visit or screening - not further disaggregated, building overhead costs, and training costs. Treatment eligibility: Risk based. Risk reduction: Lawes et al 3649.84 1968
Treatment eligibility: Risk + HTN. Risk reduction based: Lawes et al 3998.39 1968
Treatment eligibility: Risk based. Risk reduction: Rapsomaniki et al 11 553.36 1968
Treatment eligibility: Risk based. Risk reduction: Framingham score. 13 616.78 1968
Treatment eligibility: Risk + HTN. Risk reduction: Rapsomaniki et al 17 138.03 1968
Treatment eligibility: Risk + HTN. Risk reduction: Framingham score. 21 268.82 1968
Upper middle Argentina Rubinstein* Pharm plus - modelled Not applicable Hypothetical population-level model Not specified Population and clinical interventions, including mass media campaigns to promote tobacco cessation, reduction of salt in bread, bupropion for tobacco cessation, high blood pressure treatment, high cholesterol treatment and polypill strategy for people with CVD risk greater than 20%. Drugs, laboratories, labour, cost of medical visit or screening - not further disaggregated, trainings costs and media costs. Lifestyle change promotion and pharmacological therapy to achieve BP control. 2596.97 14 401
Low Ethiopia Tolla Pharm plus – modelled Not applicable Hypothetical population-level model Not specified Analysis included cost-effectiveness analysis of 15 interventions; relevant interventions were antihypertensive treatment with 25 mg hydrochlorothiazide and 50 mg atenolol per day. Patients assumed to have four visits to a health centre for the first year followed by three visits per year for the remaining 9 years. Additionally, 20% will have 1.5 visit per year at primary hospital. Drugs, laboratories, cost of medical visit or screening not further disaggregated, intervention development cost, training cost, media cost, monitoring and evaluation cost, other unspecified costs Eligibility: SBP >160 80.18 768
Eligibility: SBP >140 166.86 768

BP, blood pressure; CVD, cardiovascular disease; HTN, hypertension; KSHI, Kwara State Health Insurance; n/a, not available; NPCDCS, National Program on Prevention and Control of Cancer, Diabetes, Cardiovascular Diseases, and Stroke; PPP, purchasing-power-parity; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SE Asia, South East Asia; US$, US dollars.