Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 28;11:977. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00977

TABLE 4.

Methylation differences of S100P and HYAL2 between BC cases and controls in Study II.

CpG sites Controls median (IQR) BC cases median (IQR) OR (95% CI)* per −10% methylation p-value*
S100P_CpG_2.3 0.63 (0.61–0.67) 0.62 (0.60–0.66) 1.38 (0.71–2.69) 0.348
S100P_CpG_4 0.71 (0.67–0.76) 0.68 (0.60–0.71) 1.90 (1.23–2.95) 0.004
S100P_CpG_7 0.45 (0.39–0.52) 0.41 (0.35–0.49) 1.54 (1.11–2.15) 0.011
S100P_CpG_8 0.46 (0.41–0.51) 0.44 (0.36–0.50) 1.64 (1.09–2.47) 0.017
S100P_CpG_9 0.55 (0.51–0.58) 0.54 (0.48–0.59) 1.66 (1.06–2.60) 0.028
S100P_CpG_10.11.12 0.62 (0.58–0.65) 0.59 (0.54–0.64) 1.87 (1.07–3.29) 0.029
HYAL2_CpG_1 0.32 (0.27–0.36) 0.29 (0.22–0.32) 2.49 (1.42–4.34) 0.001
HYAL2_CpG_2 0.22 (0.18–0.26) 0.21 (0.14–0.24) 1.61 (0.93–2.77) 0.086
HYAL2_CpG_3 0.36 (0.31–0.40) 0.34 (0.28–0.38) 1.97 (1.18–3.30) 0.009
HYAL2_CpG_4 0.54 (0.51–0.59) 0.52 (0.42–0.57) 2.04 (1.30–3.22) 0.002

*Logistic regression, adjusted for age and batches of measurement. BC, breast cancer; S100P, S100 calcium-binding protein P gene; HYAL2, hyaluronoglucosaminidase 2 gene; OR, odds ratio; IQR, interquartile range. The bold values indicate p < 0.05.