Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Hippocampus. 2019 Oct 7;30(5):488–504. doi: 10.1002/hipo.23166

Table 2.

Pearson correlations between change in fitness percentile and change in ROI volume.

ROI Correlation (r) with Δ fitness Standardized beta (± St. Err) for Δ fitness
HEAD L. Subiculum −0.353* −0.322 (0.002)
R. Subiculum −0.193 −0.178 (0.003)
L. CA1 −0.140 −0.122 (0.002)
R. CA1 −0.052 −0.034 (0.001)
L. CA3/DG 0.377* 0.361 (0.002)*
R. CA3/DG −0.099 −0.103 (0.002)

BODY L. Subiculum 0.203 0.199 (0.002)
R. Subiculum 0.046 0.042 (0.003)
L. CA1 −0.076 −0.058 (0.003)
R. CA1 −0.321 −0.301 (0.002)
L. CA3/DG −0.041 −0.039 (0.001)
R. CA3/DG −0.199 −0.165 (0.001)

TAIL L. Hippocampus −0.089 −0.11 (0.002)
R. Hippocampus −0.057 −0.093 (0.003)
*

p < .05