Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 11.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Psychol Sci. 2020 May 8;8(4):641–656. doi: 10.1177/2167702620906145

Table 3.

Results from SEM Regression of Interpretive Bias Variables on the General Neuroticism Factor (GNF)

Interpretive Bias Variable β b 95% CI SE p
Positive social .01 .07 [−.71, .85] .40 .860
Negative social .16 .80 [.10, 1.50] .36 .025
Positive foil social .12 .65 [−.12, 1.41] .39 .096
Negative foil social .20 1.05 [.34, 1.76] .36 .004
Positive non-social .07 .38 [−.43, 1.19] .41 .352
Negative non-social .14 .85 [.03, 1.67] .42 .044
Positive foil non-social .15 .85 [.06, 1.64] .41 .036
Negative foil non-social .24 1.40 [.61, 2.18] .40 .001

Note. 95% CI estimates reflect the bounds of the unstandardized regression coefficients.