Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 11.
Published in final edited form as: Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Aug 23;89(1):168–176.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.08.023

Table 4.

Association between early vs. late post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) and index colonoscopy quality and examination findings.

Early PCCRC Late PCCRC
Model At Index Colonoscopy n (%) n (%) OR (95% CI)
Total 441 765
1 Colonic segment* examined
 Yes 401 (93.5) 720 (97.0) 1.00 (reference)
 No 28 (6.5) 22 (3.0) 2.42 (1.27, 4.60)
2 Polyp detected at colonic segment*
 No 314 (71.2) 579 (75.7) 1.00 (reference)
 Yes 127 (28.8) 186 (24.3) 1.27 (0.94, 1.72)
3 Polyp detected at colonic segment*
 No 314 (71.2) 579 (75.7) 1.00 (reference)
 Yes, <10 mm 61 (13.8) 133 (17.4) 0.85 (0.59, 1.24)
 Yes, ≥10 mm 66 (15.0) 53 (6.9) 2.38 (1.53, 3.70)
4 Polyp excision at colonic segment*
 No polyp 303 (73.0) 558 (77.0) 1.00 (reference)
 Complete excision 77 (18.6) 154 (21.2) 0.95 (0.67, 1.34)
 Incomplete excision 35 (8.4) 13 (1.8) 4.76 (2.35, 9.65)

n, number.

Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, family history of colorectal cancer, year of index colonoscopy, and medical region.

*

Colonic segment refers to the segment of the colon where the PCCRC was subsequently found.