Table 4. Results of serial mediation models for the effect of institutional trust (manipulation) on interpersonal trust through feelings of security.
Predictor and effect | Outcome: trusting behavior | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1 | Model 2 | |||||
b | SE | 95% CI | b | SE | 95% CI | |
Mediator 1: Feelings of security* | -0.07 | 0.10 | -0.28; 0.13 | -0.07 | 0.11 | -0.28; 0.15 |
Mediator 2: Trusting beliefs* | 0.52 | 0.17 | 0.19; 0.85 | 0.51 | 0.18 | 0.15; 0.88 |
Institutional trust (Manipulation) | ||||||
Total effect | 0.28 | 0.28 | -0.27; 0.82 | 0.38 | 0.29 | -0.19; 0.95 |
Direct effect | 0.34 | 0.34 | -0.34; 1.02 | 0.36 | 0.37 | -0.36; 1.09 |
Indirect effect | 0.21 | 0.11 | 0.06; 0.54 | 0.19 | 0.12 | 0.03; 0.54 |
Results based on 94 observations. Model 1: Mediation analyses did not include control variables. Model 2: Mediation analyses included trust propensity, security values, political orientation, risk attitudes, and education as control variables.
*Estimates of regressions of the mediators (feelings of security and trusting beliefs, respectively) predicting trusting behavior.