Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 30;9(8):824–833. doi: 10.1530/EC-20-0176

Table 1.

General characteristics of the included patients.

Variables Value/number
Age (years) 59.1 ± 16.0
Sex (M/F) 13/16
Time from diagnosis (years) 13.3 ± 12.9
Initial MRI: micro/macro-adenoma (n = 26) 5/21
IGF-1 at diagnosis (UNL, n = 15) 2.89 ± 1.57
Patients status
 Controlled, n 15
  Cured, n 7
  Normalized without treatment, n 4
  Normalized with current treatment, n 4
 Uncontrolled , n 14
 Current GH (ng/mL, n = 27) 2.07 ± 2.50
 Current IGF-1 all patients (UNL, n = 29) 1.02 ± 0.59
  IGF-1 controlled (UNL, n = 15) 0.57 ± 0.26
  IGF-1 uncontrolled (UNL, n = 14) 1.50 ± 0.44
Previous treatment
 Pituitary surgery, n 22
 Pituitary radiotherapy, n 5
 Medical treatment, n 20
  Dopamine agonist, n 7
  Somatostatin receptor ligands, n 20
  GH receptor antagonist, n 4
 Never treated, n 3
Complications
 Number of complications per patient 3.7 ± 1.7
 Diabetes, n 9
 Hypertension, n 13
 Dyslipidemia, n 14
 Cardiovascular complications, n 12
 Joints complications, n 20
 Gut complications, n 21
 Thyroid complications, n 18
 Pituitary failure, n (at least one axis) 12
 AcroQoL total score (%, n = 24) 69.2 ± 16.5
  Physical dimension (%, n = 24) 70.3 ± 19.6
  Appearance dimension (%, n = 24) 58.3 ± 21.3
  Personal relation dimension (%, n = 24) 78.7 ± 16.4
 EPICES score (n = 25) 13.3 ± 15.4

Number of assessed patients: n = 29 except otherwise mentioned. Data are given as absolute numbers or mean ± s.d. IGF-1 results are expressed as the fold increase of the upper normal limit (UNL) of the test for each patient.

F, female; M, male.