Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug;10(4):820–830. doi: 10.21037/cdt-20-381

Table 2. CT evaluation.

FFR CT >0.8 FFR CT ≤0.8
Plaque rupture (n, %) 1 [9] 10 [91]
CT anatomical evaluation
   Mild stenosis (n, %) 9 [100] 0 [0]
   Moderate stenosis (n, %) 6 [67] 3 [33]
   Severe stenosis (n, %) 1 [17] 8 [83]
CT high-risk plaque features
   Positive remodeling (n, %) 7 [44] 9 [56]
   Low attenuation plaque (n, %) 1 [33] 2 [67]
   Spotty Calcification (n, %) 1 [50] 1 [50]
   Napkin ring sign (n, %) 0 [0] 1 [100]

CT evaluation of plaque rupture, anatomical stenosis and high-risk plaque features stratified according to FFRCT results. A positive FFRCT result was defined as ≤0.8, a negative FFRCT as >0.8. Coronary artery stenosis was subdivided into mild (25–49%), moderate (50–69%) and severe (70–99%).