Table 1. Summary of carotid vulnerable plaque components.
Plaque feature | MR appearance | Clinical significance |
---|---|---|
Lipid-rich necrotic core | 1. T2 hypointense | 1. Increasing LRNC is associated with the development of new ulceration, FC rupture, and increasing plaque burden |
2. Lack of contrast enhancement on CE-T1W images | 2. Increasing LRNC is associated with fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, hospitalization for ACS, and need for revascularization | |
Fibrous cap | Intact: | 1. Thin/ruptured FC is associated with higher risk of future stroke/TIA |
1. Enhancing band adjacent to dark lumen | 2. Thin/ruptured FC is also associated with fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, hospitalization for ACS, and need for revascularization | |
2. Smooth luminal surface on TOF and CE-T1W | ||
Thin: | ||
1. Loss of enhancing band | ||
2. Persistent smooth luminal surface | ||
Ruptured: | ||
1. Disrupted, dark band on CE-T1W | ||
2. Irregular luminal surface | ||
Intraplaque hemorrhage | 1. High signal on all T1W sequences including MPRAGE, TOF, and FSE | 1. Presence of IPH is a predictor of future ipsilateral stroke |
2. Typically within LRNC, but may be seen adjacent to calcifications | 2. IPH is associated with plaque progression, with new IPH suggesting transition from stable to unstable plaque | |
3. Presence of IPH is a predictor of stroke in patients status post TIA |
CE-T1W, contrast-enhanced T1 weighted image; LRNC, lipid-rich necrotic core; ACS, acute coronary syndrome; TOF, time-of-flight MR angiography; IPH, intraplaque hemorrhage.