Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 25;43(9):zsaa046. doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsaa046

Table 6.

Best-Fit Adjusted Regression Models for Self-Reported Sleep Outcomes

Variable Participants in analysis (n) Study night (WTN exposure)† Study group‡ Sex♠ Sensitivity♣ Sleep difficulties at home♦ Tiredness at home♥
Control WTN- night β p 95% CI β p β p β p β p β p
Sleep quality (0–10)* 50 50 2.25 <0.001 1.17–3.33 1.60 <0.01 0.81 n.s. 0.94 n.s. −0.14 n.s.
Sleep quality (5-point semantic)* 50 50 2.04 <0.001 0.97–3.10 1.72 <0.001 0.76 n.s. 0.31 n.s. 1.89 <0.001
Tired–Rested (0–10)* 50 50 1.13 <0.01 0.28–1.98 1.45 <0.01 1.26 <0.05
Tense–Relaxed (0–10)* 50 50 0.68 n.s. −0.11–1.48
Irritated–Happy (0–10)* 50 50 1.49 <0.01 0.54–2.43 0.17 n.s. 1.29 <0.05 1.33 <0.05
Hard to sleep following awakenings? (no/yes) 47 47 1.34 <0.05 0.09–2.59 1.54 n.s.
Easy–Difficult to sleep (0–10) 50 50 0.89 <0.05 0.13–1.65 0.76 n.s. 1.26 <0.01
Slept better–Worse than usual (0–10) 50 49 1.84 <0.001 0.84–2.83 1.65 <0.01 −0.56 n.s.
Deep–Light sleep (0–10) 49 50 0.72 n.s. −0.9–1.52 0.84 <0.05 0.79 n.s. 1.41 <0.001
Never woke–woke a lot (0–10) 50 50 1.18 <0.01 0.37–2.00 1.56 <0.001
Sleep disturbance by WTN (0–10) 50 50 3.57 <0.001 2.43–4.72 2.11 <0.001
WTN impaired sleep quality (5-point semantic) 49 50 5.49 <0.001 3.11–7.88 4.12 <0.001 1.24 n.s. 2.05 <0.05 −0.93 n.s.
WTN caused awakenings (5-point semantic) 49 50 4.15 <0.001 2.37–5.95 2.52 <0.001 0.94 n.s. 1.19 n.s. −0.81 n.s.
WTN making it hard to fall back asleep (5-point semantic) 49 49 3.94 <0.001 2.32–5.56 2.08 <0.01 1.45 <0.05 1.11 n.s.
WTN cause tiredness in morning (5-point semantic) 49 49 3.03 <0.001 1.70–4.36 2.16 <0.001 0.88 n.s. 1.18 <0.05 1.32 <0.05 −0.64 n.s.
Mood: Pleasantness (1–4)* ♪ 49 47 1.00 <0.05 0.08–1.92 0.66 n.s. 1.71 <0.01 0.99 n.s.
Mood: Social orientation (1–4)* ♫ 49 47 0.98 n.s. −0.08–2.01 1.51 n.s. 2.2 <0.01

β, regression beta coefficient; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; n.s., not statistically significant.

Empty cells indicate the measure was both nonsignificant and did not contribute to the final model and was hence omitted from the model.

*Response scale inverted for analysis.

♪Converted from continuous data to categories with the following cutoff points: <2.8; ≥2.8 and <3.5; ≥3.5.

♫Converted from continuous data to categories with the following cutoff points: <3.0; ≥3.0 and <4.0; ≥4.0.

Reference categories as follows: †, WTN-free Control night; ‡, Reference group; ♠, Women; ♣, Low sensitivity to noise; ♦, No sleep difficulties; ♥, No excessive tiredness.