Table 2.
Summary of discordant results at Rota Dispensary and Siaya County Referral Hospital
| Method | RDT positive, n = 72 | RDT negative, n = 125 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive (%) | Negative (%) | Positive (%) | Negative (%) | |
| Rota dispensary | ||||
| MG-LAMP | 58 (80.6) | 14 (19.4) | 29 (23.2) | 96 (76.8) |
| RT-PCR | 64 (88.9) | 8 (11.1) | 18 (14.4) | 107 (85.6) |
| Expert Microscopy | 57 (79.2) | 15 (20.8) | 2 (1.6) | 123 (98.4) |
| aR-Microscopy Positive, n = 28 | R-Microscopy Negative, n = 39 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive (%) | Negative (%) | Positive (%) | Negative (%) | |
| Siaya Hospital | ||||
| MG-LAMP | 25 (89.3) | 3 (10.7) | 13 (33.3) | 26 (66.7) |
| RT-PCR | 25 (89.3) | 3 (10.7) | 5 (12.8) | 34 (87.2) |
| Expert Microscopy | 28 (100) | 0 (0) | 1 (2.6) | 38 (97.4) |
aRoutine microscopy