Table 3.
Method | −2.5 ≤ logP ≤ − 2 | 5 ≤ logP ≤ 5.5 | 150 ≤ MW ≤ 200 | 500 ≤ MW ≤ 550 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Success | Diversity | Success | Diversity | Success | Diversity | Success | Diversity | |
ZINC | 0.3% | 0.919 | 1.3% | 0.909 | 1.7% | 0.938 | 0 | – |
ORGAN | 0 | – | 0.2% | 0.909 | 15.1% | 0.759 | 0.1% | 0.907 |
JT-VAE | 11.3% | 0.846 | 7.6% | 0.907 | 0.7% | 0.824 | 16.0% | 0.898 |
GCPN | 85.5% | 0.392 | 54.7% | 0.855 | 76.1% | 0.921 | 74.1% | 0.920 |
MW here stands for the Molecular Weight. Success is defined as the percentage of generated molecules in the target range and Diversity is defined as the average pairwise Tanimoto distance between the Morgan fingerprints of the molecules. Citations to ORGAN and JT-VAE are given in the legend to Table 2
Italics values refer to the best results among the methods compared