Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 20;11(9):1717–1722. doi: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.0c00223

Table 2. Binding Affinity and Contractile Activity of URP and Related Analogs.

  Binding Affinity Aortic ring contraction
Peptide pIC50 pEC50 Emaxa
URP 8.29 ± 0.08 8.16 ± 0.08 107 ± 3
[D-Phe(pI)4]URP 8.61 ± 0.11 7.54 ± 0.10* 114 ± 5
[D-Bip4]URP 8.50 ± 0.11 7.32 ± 0.13** 97 ± 7
[D-Pep4]URP 7.92 ± 0.12 7.55 ± 0.15* 99 ± 8**
[Trip4]URP 6.87 ± 0.10*** 8.11 ± 0.38 9 ± 1***
[Tyr(OBn)4]URP 8.10 ± 0.12 <5.5 80%b
[Phe(pThio-3)4]URP 7.44 ± 0.11*** <5.5 20%b
[Phe(pPy-3)4]URP 6.99 ± 0.11*** <5.5 24%b
[Phe(pPy-4)4]URP 6.81 ± 0.15*** <5.5 5%b
a

The maximum efficacy is defined as a percentage of the KCl-induced contraction (40 mM) divided by the hUII-induced tissue-response (10–6 M).

b

Maximum efficacy at 3 × 10–6 M. All values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis, using URP values as controls, were performed using unpaired Student’s t test, *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001. Experiments were conducted at least 3 times and on tissues from different animals or on different cellular passages.