Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 3;6(5):e98. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2020.81

Table 3.

Screening positive for subthreshold PTSD or PTSD on the PCL-5a

Variable Subthreshold/threshold PCL-5
B s.e. Odds ratio 95% CI
Sample 1: Previously deployed (n = 175)
Combat experiences
1–2b
3–4 1.09 0.85 2.98 0.64–21.40
5 or more 0.73 0.87 2.07 0.44–15.26
Witnessing an ASR
No witnessing an ASRc
Low levels of witnessing an ASR 0.95 0.77 2.58 0.59–13.60
High levels of witnessing an ASR 2.16** 0.73 8.69 2.29–42.60
Model fit
Model χ2 10.02**
Model d.f. 4
Nagelkerke R2 0.193
Sample 2: currently deployed (n = 490)
Combat experiences
1–2b
3–4 0.48 0.30 1.61 0.90–2.90
5 or more 0.93** 0.28 2.53 1.46–4.43
Witnessing an ASR
No witnessing an ASRc
Low levels of witnessing an ASR 0.37 0.29 1.45 0.80–2.56
High levels of witnessing an ASR 0.51 0.27 1.67 0.98–2.81
Model fit
Model χ2 25.90***
Model d.f. 4
Nagelkerke R2 0.105

PCL-5, PTSD Checklist; ASR, acute stress reaction.

a.

Subthreshold PTSD or PTSD included both those scoring above subthreshold and those scoring above threshold for PTSD. The model for sample 1 removed 1 missing cases (0.5%). The model for sample 2 removed 7 missing cases (1.4%).

b.

Combat experience was calculated in terms of frequency of exposure to eight combat experiences in which items were dichotomised and then summed.

c.

Witnessing an ASR was calculated in terms of severity of exposure to a team member exhibiting ASR symptoms in which six items were dichotomised and then summed, with low levels 1–3 and high levels 4–6.

**P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.