Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 11;15:403. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01919-9

Table 3.

Subgroup analyses of PRP compared with HA for WOMAC total scores at 12 months

Subgroup No. of trials Standard mean difference
(95% CI)
P value I2
(%)
Test of
interaction, P
Total 8 − 1.47 (− 2.23, − 0.70) 0.000 95.3
Number of PRP injections
  1 4 − 1.15 (− 2.14, − 0.85) 0.000 69.3 0.006
  ≥2 4 − 1.68 (− 2.35, − 0.72) 0.000 98.2
PRP spinning approach
  Single 3 − 1.13 (− 2.22, − 0.85) 0.000 0.0 0.028
  Double 5 − 1.62 (− 2.34, − 1.11) 0.000 88.4
PRP classification
  LPP 3 − 2.89 (− 6.55, − 0.68) 0.000 82.4 0.002
  LRP 5 0.86 (0.15, 1.56) 0.000 83.5
Fresh or frozen PRP
  Fresh 5 0.78 (0.54,1.01) 0.000 57.8 0.105
  Frozen 3 0.50 (0.33,0.67) 0.000 88.1
Activator used
  Yes 4 − 2.78 (− 4.32, − 1.15) 82.1 0.031
  No 4 0.58 (0.12, 1.58) 93.4
Risk of bias
  Low 6 − 1.23 (− 2.08, − 0.35) 0.002 85.9 0.254
  Unclear/high 2 − 1.33 (− 2.24, − 0.46) 0.004 89.4
Molecular weight
  High 4 − 1.90 (− 4.53, 0.73) 0.157 97.9 0.003
  Low 4 − 1.31 (− 1.97, − 0.64) 0.000 92.2
Structure
  Cross-linked 4 − 2.06 (− 3.20, − 0.92) 0.352 96.2 0.000
  Not cross-linked or unclear 4 − 0.57 (− 1.78, 0.63) 0.000 95.0