Table 4.

“Fair/Poor” vs. “Good” or “Very Good/Excellent” Self-Rated Health status with physical frailty status as an independent variable

Frailty Status	Prevalence n (%)	Unadjusted OR (95% CI)	Model 1 OR (95% CI)	Model 2 OR (95% CI)	Model 3 OR (95% CI)
Not Frail	413 (33.4)	Ref	Ref	Ref	Ref
Pre-Frail	652 (52.8)	2.31 (1.81–2.94)	2.17 (1.68–2.80)	1.87 (1.41–2.47)	1.73 (1.30–2.30)
Frail	170 (13.8)	10.75 (7.47–15.46)	9.44 (6.42–13.89)	7.42 (4.81–11.45)	6.81 (4.34–10.68)

ORs and 95% Confidence intervals were obtained from ordinal logistic regression models

Model 1: Adjusted for sociodemographic variables: age, sex, race, marital status, highest level of education

Model 2: Adjusted for variables in model 1, clinical variables (symptoms of AF, type of AF, ablation type, and multimorbidity) and health behaviors (alcohol use and smoking status)

Model 3: Adjusted for variables in model 2 and psychosocial/geriatric measures (low social support, independent functioning, cognitive impairment, hearing impairment, and visual impairment)