Table 2.

Gene annotation and reported QTLs for the shared genomic regions between runs of homozygosity (ROH) hotspots and the putative sweep regions retrieved from the within-population and cross-populations DCMS statistics

BTA1	Start	End	Genes	QTL2
Within-population DCMS statistic x ROH
1	8,300,000	8,350,000	–	Somatic cell score [27]
1	41,600,000	41,650,000	EPHA6, ARL6	Maturity rate [28]
1	112,250,000	112,300,000	KCNAB1	–
8	15,800,000	15,850,000	–	Tick resistance [29]
15	35,365,655	35,399,999	OTOG	–
15	35,400,001	35,450,000	–	–
18	34,718,675	34,750,000	CDH16, RRAD	–
21	6,550,000	6,600,000	ADAMTS17	Calving ease [30]
21	63,250,000	63,300,000	VRK1	Interval to first estrus after calving [31]
Cross-population DCMS statistic x ROH
3	77,250,000	77,300,000	–	Body condition score [23]
5	31,800,000	31,850,000	–	Body weight (yearling) [24], Conception rate [32]
5	38,761,637	38,761,745	YAF2
7	57,050,000	57,100,000	–	Rump angle [33]
11	67,450,000	67,500,000	ANTXR1, GFPT1	Body weight (yearling) [24], Body energy content [34]
11	67,700,000	67,749,999	–	–
11	67,750,001	67,800,000	NFU1	–
11	68,550,000	68,600,000	PCYOX1	–
14	52,900,000	52,914,848	–	Maturity rate [28]
15	10,150,000	10,200,000	–	–
15	10,900,000	10,950,000	–	Calving ease (maternal) [35], Daughter pregnancy rate [35], Foot angle [35], Milk fat percentage [35], Milk fat yield [35], Net merit [35], Length of productive life [35], Milk protein percentage [35], Milk protein yield [35], Calving ease [35], Somatic cell score [35]
20	38,000,000	38,050,000	RANBP3L, NADK2	Milk protein percentage [36], Milk protein yield [37], Milk yield [37], Coat texture [38]
21	200,000	250,000	–	–
25	1,345,564	1,350,000	NME3, MRPS34	Milk fat yield [39]

¹ BTA: Bos taurus autosome; ² QTLs within the candidate genomic regions are highlighted in bold. Non-bold QTLs were the closest and most suitable candidate QTL for the given candidate region