Table 3.
Factor loadings of 7 components comparing two extraction methods.
| Model Extraction | PSQI-7 | PSQI-5 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCA | ML | PCA | ML | |||
| Number of Factors | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 
| Component-1 | 0.682b | 0.385 | 0.721a | 0.225 | 0.712a | 0.593c | 
| Component-2 | 0.606c | 0.138 | 0.398e | −0.018 | 0.635b | 0.556c | 
| Component-3 | 0.751a | −0.169 | 0.561c | −0.228 | 0.741a | 0.608c | 
| Component-4 | 0.623c | −0.353 | 0.460d | −0.352 | 0.596c | 0.478d | 
| Component-5 | 0.541d | 0.123 | 0.397e | −0.040 | 0.553c | 0.455d | 
| Component-6 | −0.012 | 0.816a | 0.118 | 0.604c | ||
| Component-7 | 0.060 | 0.446d | 0.099 | 0.386e | ||
Loadings are a = excellent, b = very good, c = good, d = fair, e = poor.
PSQI, Pittsburgh sleep quality index; PCA, principal component analysis; ML, maximum likelihood.