Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 18;126(4):729–744. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcaa076

Table 3.

Comparison of the model simulations of the five different scenarios from Table 1 using identical parameter values for each simulation with their respective measured plant length and dry weight at the end of the growing season (where relevant). Measured variables are shown with a single standard deviation

Simulation year 2015 2016
Simulation reference name 2015_ calibration 2015_ branchless 2016_ validation 2016_ branchless 2016_ fullbranch
Density [cm x cm] 25 x 25 25 x 25 25 x 25 15 x 6 50 x 50
Number of branches per plant 4 0 4 0 6
Simulated plant length [m] 0.82 1.47 0.84 0.71 1.09
Measured plant length [m] 0.80 ± 0.05 - 0.65 ± 0.09 1.07 ± 0.16 0.62 ± 0.06
Simulated total photosynthesis [g CO2] 70.94 46.30 74.16 13.71 189.45
Simulated seed dry weight [g] 16.14 18.55 16.96 4.04 46.58
Measured seed dry weight [g] 15.71 ± 7.40 - 20.71 ± 8.93 3.60 ± 2.25 55.54 ± 15.52
Simulated stem dry weight [g] 9.48 10.11 10.02 2.70 26.60
Measured stem dry weight [g] 8.02 ± 2.52 - 14.33 ± 6.23 3.76 ± 2.16 45.92 ± 12.13
Total simulation time [h] 24.35 10.18 24.80 10.29 40.41