Table 5.
Hierarchical linear regression analysis examining the moderating role of intolerance of uncertainty on the relationship between social isolation and distress.
| Variable | B (SE) | 95% BCa CI |
β | R2 | ΔR2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LL | UL | |||||
| Step 3 | .66 | .01** | ||||
| Intercept | 18.26 (1.33) | 15.82 | 21.06 | −0.05 | ||
| Age | −0.09 (0.03) | −0.16 | −0.03 | −0.12 | ||
| Gender (Male) | 0.32 (1.18) | −1.51 | 2.50 | 0.01 | ||
| Gender (Another gender) | 1.80 (3.65) | −8.23 | 9.61 | 0.02 | ||
| Race (Nonwhite) | 0.90 (1.46) | −2.37 | 4.26 | 0.02 | ||
| Social isolation | 0.70 (0.11) | 0.93 | 0.43 | 0.31 | ||
| Psychological inflexibility | 0.51 (0.08) | 0.34 | 0.66 | 0.37 | ||
| Emotion suppression | −0.24 (0.10) | −0.43 | −0.06 | −0.10 | ||
| Intolerance of uncertainty | 0.26 (0.06) | 0.14 | 0.42 | 0.21 | ||
| Social isolation x Intolerance of uncertainty |
0.03 (0.01) | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.12 | ||
Note. N = 254. Bootstrap replications = 1188. Reference categories are female for gender and white for race. BCa CI = bias corrected and accelerated bootstrap confidence intervals (estimates are bold when BCa CI does not cross zero); LL = lower limit; UL = upper limit. Steps 1 and 2 are the same as in Table 4.