Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2020 Aug 12;12(8):e9704. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9704

Meigs’ Versus Pseudo-Meigs’ Syndrome: A Case of Pleural Effusion, Ascites, and Ovarian Mass

Paul Nguyen 1,, Omid Yazdanpanah 1, Brianna Schumaker 2
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC7489329  PMID: 32944427

Abstract

Meigs’ syndrome is classically characterized as the triad of ascites, pleural effusion, and ovarian fibroma. The incidence is not easily determined but has been described in medical literature. We report a case of a patient who presented for shortness of breath and was found to have pleural effusion, ascites, and an ovarian mass. Investigative measures were consistent with Meigs’ syndrome; however, definitive diagnosis was not able to be determined as our patient opted for symptomatic treatment rather than pursue surgical options. We discuss the pathophysiology of pleural effusion, ascites, and management of Meigs’ and pseudo-Meigs’ syndrome. Ultimately, we discuss palliative options for patients who are not ideal candidates for surgery.

Keywords: meigs’ syndrome, pseudo-meigs’, pleural effusion, ascites, ovarian mass, ca-125

Introduction

Meigs’ syndrome is classically defined as the triad of ascites, pleural effusion, and benign ovarian fibroma. A key feature found in patients with Meigs’ syndrome is the resolution of symptoms after tumor resection [1]. Meigs’ syndrome is a rare condition that can only be diagnosed after ovarian carcinoma is ruled out. This remains a challenge as cancer antigen-125 (CA-125) is often elevated and workup findings typically mirror those of metastatic disease [2]. Meigs’ syndrome stands in contrast to pseudo-Meigs, which presents with ascites and pleural effusion in association with benign tumors of the ovary (other than fibromas) and malignant tumors. Benign tumors in this category include mucinous cystadenomas, teratomas, struma ovarii, and leiomyomas [3]. Although it is difficult to determine the incidence of Meigs’ syndrome, it has been reported that 0.20 per 100,000 women are diagnosed with ovarian sex cord stromal tumors (SCST) [4]. Of these SCSTs, fibromas account for 4% [5].

Case presentation

A 58-year-old female patient with a past medical history of severe obstructive sleep apnea, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hypertension, and bipolar disorder presented to the emergency department (ED) for shortness of breath of two-day duration. She endorsed having a clear productive cough with fever and chills but denied any sick contacts. In the ED, the patient was tachycardic with a heart rate of 132 beats per minute, saturating 96% on room air, and hyponatremic at 127 mmol/L with a leukocytosis of 17.4 K/cumm. Chest x-ray (CXR) revealed a small left pleural effusion (Figure 1). The patient was admitted for further management of her shortness of breath and started on treatment for presumed COPD exacerbation/community acquired pneumonia.

Figure 1. Chest x-ray showing development of left pleural effusion (red arrow).

Figure 1

The following day, the patient became hypoxic, saturating 86% on room air. Supplemental oxygen of two-liter nasal cannula was initiated and a repeat CXR showed bilateral pleural effusion, left greater than right. A diagnostic thoracentesis was performed, and 550 mL of cloudy yellow fluid was removed and sent for analysis. Fluid analysis revealed 1,745 nucleated cells, neutrophilic predominance of 61%, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) 88 units/liter, protein 3.8 gm/dL, and glucose 100 mg/dL, with serum LDH 139 units/liter and protein 6.4 gm/dL. This met Light’s criteria for exudative effusion as fluid LDH to serum ratio was 0.633 and protein ratio was 0.59. Fluid cytology result was negative for malignant cells. A CT of the thorax and abdomen/pelvis was completed and showed pulmonary emphysema, bilateral pleural effusions, small pericardial effusion, nodular liver consistent with cirrhosis with small amounts of ascites and a semi-solid/semi-cystic left ovarian mass measuring 8.3 cm (Figures 2, 3).

Figure 2. CT thorax showing pericardial effusion (red arrow) and bilateral pleural effusion (white arrow).

Figure 2

Figure 3. Pelvic CT showing semi solid/semi cystic left ovarian mass measuring 8.3 cm (yellow arrows).

Figure 3

A transvaginal ultrasound showed a stable 8.6-cm multilocular cystic left adnexal mass (Figure 4), which was compatible with benign cystic ovarian neoplasm such as a cystadenoma or less likely peritoneal inclusion cyst. Serum tumor markers of CA-125 were elevated at 110 units/mL (reference range 0.5-35). CA-19-9, alpha fetoprotein, and carcinoembryogenic antigen were within normal limits. Gynecology-oncology was consulted for ovarian mass and recommended to follow up as outpatient for cystectomy with possible oophorectomy and salpingectomy, in addition to a diagnostic paracentesis for cytologic analysis. However, given our patient’s comorbidities, she opted not to pursue definitive diagnosis with surgery and instead sought symptomatic treatment. 

Figure 4. Transvaginal ultrasound showing a stable 8.6-cm multilocular left adnexal cyst with solid component (yellow circle). Color score = 1. O-RADS score = 4. Intermediate risk of malignancy (10 to <50%).

Figure 4

O-RADS, Ovarian-Adnexal Imaging-Reporting and Data System

Discussion

The combination of adnexal mass with pleural effusion and ascites in our case raised suspicion for Meigs’ syndrome. This syndrome is a rare disorder characterized by pleural effusion and ascites in patients with ovarian fibroma or fibroma-like tumors [6]. It was first described in 1887 by Demons, and later in 1937 by Meigs, who arrived at the same findings about association of pleural effusion, ascites, and benign ovarian fibroma. Hence, this syndrome is also known as Demons-Meigs' syndrome [7]. On the other hand, benign tumors of the ovary (other than fibromas) and ovarian malignancies, such as mature teratomas and struma ovarii, can also be associated with pleural effusions and ascites but they are categorized as pseudo-Meigs’ syndrome [3].

Krenke et al. reviewed pleural effusion characteristics in reported cases of Meigs’ syndrome. They found that the average amount of pleural fluid withdrawn was approximately three liters, and the majority of pleural effusions typically occurred on the right side. The majority of pleural effusions in patients with Meigs’ syndrome are exudative [8]. In our case, the pleural fluid analysis also revealed an exudative effusion with no malignant cells, consistent with the majority of Meigs’ syndrome cases. Review of reported cases of pseudo-Meigs syndrome shows that pleural fluid in these patients contains reactive mesothelial cells with no neoplastic cells [9].

Pleural effusion in Meigs’ syndrome is thought to be secondary to the passage of ascitic fluid to the pleural space through the diaphragm or diaphragmatic lymph nodes. Several hypotheses have been proposed for the underlying pathophysiology of ascites in these patients. Fluid leakage from edematous fibromas, tumor pressure on pelvic and abdominal lymphatics, and causing lymphatic blockage are among these theories [10]. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) that raises capillary permeability is also reported to be associated with formation of pleural and peritoneal fluid. Ishiko et al. reported a significant difference between the VEGF levels in the pleural and peritoneal fluid before and after tumor removal in patients with Meigs’ syndrome [11].

CA-125 antigen is a tumor marker associated with ovarian carcinoma. Nevertheless, elevated levels of CA-125 have also been reported in the literature for Meigs syndrome, although levels above 1,000 U/mL were rarely reported [2,12]. Lin et al. used immunohistochemical techniques to localize CA-125 expression, and they found that it is expressed by mesothelium rather than the fibroma [13]. Case reviews have shown that higher levels of CA-125 are associated with higher volume of ascites but size of tumor was not linearly correlated with CA-125 levels [14].

Following multidisciplinary evaluation, our patient decided to not pursue surgical intervention to remove the adnexal mass due to multiple comorbidities. Removal of the tumor will ultimately result in resolution of ascites, pleural effusion, and normalization of CA-125 in Meigs’ and pseudo-Meigs’ syndrome [1,15]. However, surgery may not be feasible options for all the patients. Patients with malignant pleural effusion and ascites or the ones who have significant comorbidities will not always choose to pursue adnexal mass resection. This is where symptom control and palliative medicine are sought out. Repeated large-volume paracentesis and/or thoracentesis have been palliative choices for these patients. Another option is abdominal indwelling peritoneal catheter placement, which is associated with the same complication rates but lowers separate patient encounters and increases patient satisfaction [16]. Repeated thoracentesis, indwelling pleural catheter (IPC), and pleurodesis are the available therapeutic modalities for management of symptomatic pleural effusion. Multiple studies have reported that IPC placement not only results in good symptomatic control but also can lead to spontaneous pleurodesis [17,18]. Therefore, it is important for providers to counsel Meigs’ syndrome patients who are not ideal candidates for surgery on all of the available palliative options for symptomatic relief.

Conclusions

In this case report, we presented a patient who had pleural effusions, ascites, elevated CA-125, and an adnexal mass. These findings are consistent with the classical presentation of Meigs’ syndrome. However, definitive diagnosis was not made due to the patient’s preference of symptomatic treatment rather than definitive treatment with surgical intervention given her comorbidities. Therefore, it is important for providers to counsel Meigs’ syndrome patients who are not ideal candidates for surgery on all of the available palliative options for symptomatic relief.

The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Human Ethics

Consent was obtained by all participants in this study

References


Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES