Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer. 2019 Oct 29;126(3):593–601. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32552

Table 2:

Heterogeneity of frontline therapy for pediatric MPAL

Induction Therapy Post-induction Therapy, n (%)
ALL only ALL
+HSCT
AML only AML
+HSCT
Hybrid only Hybrid +HSCT HSCT only Missing§§ Total
ALL 21 (38.9) 4 (7.4) 0 (0.0) 2 (3.7) 4 (7.4) 0 (0.0) 3 (5.6) 5 (9.3) 39 (72.2)
AML 2 (3.7) 0 (0.0) 4 (7.4) 3 (5.6) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 2 (3.7) 2 (3.7) 13 (24.1)
Hybrid 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 2 (3.7) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 2 (3.7)
Total 23 (42.6) 4 (7.4) 4 (7.4) 5 (9.3) 4 (7.4) 2 (3.7) 5 (9.3) 7 (13.0) 54 (100)

percent of total cohort.

Hybrid= components of AML + ALL therapy (n=2).

Regimen #1= prednisone, thioguanine, cytarabine, daunorubicin, vincristine, asparaginase); Regimen #2= cytarabine, daunorubicin, etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, asparaginase, ifosfamide, etoposide);

§

Missing= no data available.