TABLE VII.
Predictor | Mobility Outcome* | Conclusions | ||||
GFAQ Walking Ability Score† | FMS 5 m† | FMS 50 m† | FMS 500 m† | BAMF Lower-Extremity Gross Motor Scale† | ||
Logistic regressions: ln(P/(1 − P)) = A + B × X | ||||||
OI Type III or IV vs. OI Type I | 10.2‡ | 2.2‡ | 4.4‡ | 5.7‡ | 5.7‡ | OI Types III and IV showed worse mobility outcome compared with OI Type I |
Non-expanding vs. expanding rods in tibiae | 3.6§ | NS | 4.4‡ | 3.6§ | 2.9‡ | Subjects with non-expanding rods in tibiae showed worse results than those with expanding rods |
Non-expanding vs. expanding rods in femora | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | No significant differences in mobility outcome for subjects with expanding or non-expanding rods in femora |
Bisphosphonates: no or yes | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | No significant differences in mobility outcome for rodded subjects with or without treatment with oral or intravenous bisphosphonates |
Simultaneous rodding of both femora vs. 1 femur | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | No significant differences in mobility outcome for subjects with simultaneous or non-simultaneous femoral rodding |
Simultaneous rodding of femur and tibia vs. 1 femur | 6.5‡ | 3.9‡ | 6.4‡ | 4.1‡ | 6.3‡ | Subjects with tibiae and femora rodded simultaneously had significantly worse mobility outcome |
Sequence of rodding: 2 femora vs. 1 femur first | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | No significant differences in mobility outcome for subjects with 1 femoral rodding first compared with 2 femora first |
Linear regressions: Y = A + B × X | ||||||
Standardized height | 0.22‡ | 0.18‡ | 0.21‡ | 0.13‡ | 0.21‡ | A weak association was found between standard height and all of the mobility outcome (direct relation) |
Standardized weight | 0.10‡ | 0.07‡ | 0.10‡ | 0.07‡ | 0.08‡ | A weak association was found between standard weight and all of the mobility outcomes (direct relation) |
Standardized BMI | 0.11‡ | 0.05‡ | 0.06‡ | 0.06‡ | 0.10‡ | A weak association was found between standard BMI and all of the mobility outcomes (direct relation) |
Age at first rodding | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | No association was found between the age at the time of the first rodding surgical procedure reported and the mobility outcome |
NS = no significant correlation.
The values are given as the odds ratio for the logistic regression or as the coefficient of determination (R2) for the linear regression.
Significant at p ≤ 0.05.
Significant at p ≤ 0.01.