Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 14;6(9):e04943. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04943

Table 9.

Comparison of Gibbs energies of formation and growth calculated using the Battley and Roels methods.

Name Formation
Growth
ΔfG⁰Battley (kJ/C-mol) ΔfG⁰Roels (kJ/C-mol) Relative deviation ΔrG⁰Battley (kJ/C-mol) ΔrG⁰Roels (kJ/C-mol) Relative deviation
SARS-CoV-2: Entire virus -24.84 -24.17 -2.7% -6.9 -6.2 -9.7%
SARS-CoV-2: Nucleocapsid -33.73 -33.85 0.4% -222.2 -222.4 0.1%
MERS: Entire virus -24.28 -23.52 -3.1% -7.5 -6.7 -10.2%
MERS: Nucleocapsid -32.26 -32.22 -0.1% -208.5 -208.4 0.0%
SARS-1: Entire virus -24.68 -24.05 -2.5% -6.5 -5.9 -9.6%
SARS-1: Nucleocapsid -33.46 -33.64 0.5% -230.3 -230.5 0.1%
Lung - parenchyma -24.94 -25.37 1.7% -49.8 -50.2 0.9%