Table 2.
The Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios of Different Techniques for CRC, in Contrast to the No-Screening Method
| Screening Test | Study/Reference | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wong22 | Dinh23 | Ladabaum24 | Sharaf25 | Sharp26 | Dan27 | Kingsley28 | Wong29 | |
| FIT 2-year | 4328 | - | −11391 | - | 1306 | - | - | - |
| FIT yearly | 4587 | −16169 | −7970 | −7243 | - | 34580 | −6005 | - |
| FIT+COLOx1a | - | −12695 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| FIT+sigmoidoscopy | - | −12243 | - | −1988 | - | 47205 | - | - |
| Sigmoidoscopy once | - | - | - | −11,712 | 1257 | 25981 | - | - |
| Sigmoidoscopy 5-year | - | - | −3330 | - | 45448 | −3109 | 40237 | |
| Colonoscopy 10-year | 5265 | −10400 | 15283 | 2959 | - | 38745 | 3316 | 22391 |
| Single Colonoscopy | - | - | - | - | - | 43911 | - | - |
| Stool DNA | - | 30014 | - | - | - | 48205 | 16046 | - |
| Virtual colonography 5-y | - | - | - | - | - | 49830 | - | - |
Notes: The negative ICER indicates that the new technique is less costly and more effective. The positive ICERs refer to those techniques that are more costly and more effective; both numerators and denominators are positive.
Abbreviation: aCOLOx1, colonoscopy once.