TABLE 4.
Reference | Association | Control of key confounding | Selection unrelated to sodium/outcome | Coinciding follow-up/baseline exam | Departures from intended exposure | Potential for systematic error | Potential for random error | Adequate follow-up |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cook et al. (91) | + | L | L | L | U | L | L | L |
Lamelas et al. (136) | + | H | M | U | U | H | H | U |
Doukky et al. (96) | 0 | H | H | U | U | H | L | U |
He J et al. (111) | 0 | L | H | L | U | L | L | U |
Kalogeropoulos et al. (123) | 0 | H | H | H | U | H | L | U |
Liu H et al. (143) | 0 | L | L | H | U | H | H | L |
Merino et al. (154) | 0 | L | U | L | U | H | H | L |
Singer et al. (192) | 0 | H | H | H | H | H | H | U |
Welsh et al. (216) | 0 | L | L | L | U | H | H | U |
Lelli et al. (138) | − | L | M | H | U | L | H | U |
Saulnier et al. (189) | − | H | H | U | U | H | H | U |
Mente et al. (152) | U-shaped | H | H | U | U | H | H | U |
Total high rankings | 7 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 0 |
n = 12. H, high; L, low; M, moderate; U, unclear.