Skip to main content
. 2020 May 25;11(5):1174–1200. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmaa049

TABLE 4.

Risk of bias assessment of prospective studies examining dietary sodium and its association with all-cause mortality1

Reference Association Control of key confounding Selection unrelated to sodium/outcome Coinciding follow-up/baseline exam Departures from intended exposure Potential for systematic error Potential for random error Adequate follow-up
Cook et al. (91) + L L L U L L L
Lamelas et al. (136) + H M U U H H U
Doukky et al. (96) 0 H H U U H L U
He J et al. (111) 0 L H L U L L U
Kalogeropoulos et al. (123) 0 H H H U H L U
Liu H et al. (143) 0 L L H U H H L
Merino et al. (154) 0 L U L U H H L
Singer et al. (192) 0 H H H H H H U
Welsh et al. (216) 0 L L L U H H U
Lelli et al. (138) L M H U L H U
Saulnier et al. (189) H H U U H H U
Mente et al. (152) U-shaped H H U U H H U
Total high rankings 7 6 3 1 8 7 0
1

n = 12. H, high; L, low; M, moderate; U, unclear.